Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond the Darkest Veils of Inner Wickedness
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nom withdrawn. Kurykh 00:38, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Beyond the Darkest Veils of Inner Wickedness[edit]
- Beyond the Darkest Veils of Inner Wickedness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Demo cassette tape, limited to 500 copies. Prod tag removed, no sources for notability provided. Aipzith (talk) 07:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Suggest merge of Paroxysmal Holocaust, Beyond the Darkest Veils of Inner Wickedness, and Time Shall Tell into List of Therion demo albums. While notable as early releases of the band's work, they don't work well as stand-alone articles. Failing that, they should be somehow worked into Therion discography.--SeizureDog (talk) 11:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article seems to fail WP:MUSIC—Demos, mixtapes, bootlegs and promo-only records are in general not notable, although these demos belongs to the band which is one of the most influential music group of its genre. The article is expandable and can provide informations about roots of the band. It is also production of notable musicians. Visor (talk) 15:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, you say "Ќeep" but then say it fails WP:Music... Aipzith (talk) 07:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I said "it seems to fail", not "it fails". WP:MUSIC states that Demos etc. are _in general_ not notable but I've provided some proofs of notability. Visor (talk) 10:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you talking about the MusicBrainz link? Because all it does is list the three songs. Currently the article has a couple of links that prove that the demo exists, and that the information is factually accurate, but I see nothing to indicate notability. This article consists of the barest of information. If it is expandable, please do add something. Aipzith (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I have expanded article as far as I could. However, it still can be expanded from further references, such as Celebrators of Becoming documentary, interviews, etc. No, I'm not talking about MusicBrainz link. By notability, I meant that is a production of notable musicians, one of the most influential music group of its genre and such album is a great illustration of the band's roots, no matter it was released in 500 copies and head of the band says this album sucks ;) Visor (talk) 13:31, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you talking about the MusicBrainz link? Because all it does is list the three songs. Currently the article has a couple of links that prove that the demo exists, and that the information is factually accurate, but I see nothing to indicate notability. This article consists of the barest of information. If it is expandable, please do add something. Aipzith (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I said "it seems to fail", not "it fails". WP:MUSIC states that Demos etc. are _in general_ not notable but I've provided some proofs of notability. Visor (talk) 10:17, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, you say "Ќeep" but then say it fails WP:Music... Aipzith (talk) 07:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll withdraw my nomination of this article from consideration for deletion, since it is much improved by Visor from the state in which I found it. If sombody feels like merging this somewhere, that's up to them. Aipzith (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.