Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond (2012 TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond (2012 TV series)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced entry on future television show; fails WP:CRYSTAL. Prod declined without comment. Hairhorn (talk) 01:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - At the article's beginning, it would have been a case of WP:CRYSTAL, but December is only three months away so it is possible that the series will premiere. Considering that I am not fluent with Chinese, would another user confirm if any of these Google HK news results are useful? SwisterTwister talk 02:25, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Someone does need to check possible refs, but "might be notable in the future" isn't really a reason to keep. Hairhorn (talk) 11:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Incubate for a short while. As its airdate is approaching, we can place this where it will benefit from regular editing until ready for a return to article space. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 05:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:24, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing happened with It Takes Two (Singaporean TV series) not long ago. Why not wait a bit longer? The airing date is approaching and there will be more press coverage by then. - Acsiann88 (talk) 11:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good a idea. Corn cheese (talk) 23:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userfy: This isn't a WP:CRYSTAL situation because there's a definite airing date. Yet where are the reliable secondary sources to satisfy WP:GNG? I can find none, but I'm not capable of searching in Chinese. I would argue keep if substantial Chinese sourcing can be found. Otherwise userfy unless and until it attracts significant notice following airing. --Batard0 (talk) 08:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unfortunately no references and no details of when the programme will air means that there is nothing of substance by which to establish notability. If a reliable reference could be given I would change my vote to keep, but without any source, the information on the page has to be regarded as unreliable.Fireflo (talk) 11:05, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.