Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beverly de Nance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:57, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beverly de Nance[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While, according to the CFSC article, she and her partner did win two bronze medals back in the 1950s, that does not qualify as notability as per WP:SKATER. Nothing turned up in searches regarding her either, so she doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:36, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Fails WP:V. Kb.au (talk) 00:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no refs in the article, i googled for her but could only find her obituary and a list of results. Szzuk (talk) 19:58, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the level of competion she was in does not lead to automatic notability. We lack enough sources to otherwise show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:07, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking references and notability. Kraose (talk) 07:01, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.