Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Days (webcomic)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 22:09, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Better Days (webcomic)

I created this page back in 2005, and was recently asked about it possibly being deleted, which I agree to. Nothing notable about the comic, although the Wikipedia page was mentioned on the author's website. Small number of google hits ([1]) Thunderbrand 18:14, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, while a furry, right-wing webcomic does sound like a lot of fun, it doesn't appear that there are many reliable, independent sources available. Recury 20:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - enjoyable comic that I read regularly, but inherently not notable in the grand scheme of things. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - Yeah, I tagged this as unsourced and lacking importance. If the influx of visitors from Wikipedia was noticed, then it can't really have been that popular to begin with. - Hahnchen 23:25, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - I had no idea what Better Days was when a friend mentioned it in a blog post. This entry was the first hit in when I googled it, and I found it very useful. I may be a fringe case, but I'm happy that it was there when I needed the info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.104.80 (talk • contribs)
• Could this be transcluded to Comixpedia? Not enough evidence of notability as far as I could tell. delete possibly after transclusion. ++Lar: t/c 21:32, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

As a side note, there is a page on this at Wikifur ([2]). Thunderbrand 21:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

• Comment Verify Demented_Cartoon_Movie, which has survived an afd. User:Yy-bo 22:25, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• The operating rule is WP:WEB. The first criteria for whether a subject is notable reads: "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." Better Days has the following reviews on-line:
  • http://www.masterzdm.com/enter/webcomicbookclub/full.php?cid=234
  • http://www.crushyiffdestroy.com/show-article.php?file=bdays
  • http://www.tokyopop.com/RemAkimichi/blog/5264.html
  • http://sinnlos9.blogg.de/eintrag.php?id=220 (Auf Deutsch)
  • http://www.killboredom.com/comicInfo.php?cid=379
  • http://www.thewebcomiclist.com/p/237/better-days (Mostly because of the comments at the end)
  • http://www.onlinecomics.net/pages/forums/view.php?discID=2153 (Mostly because of the comments at the end.)

  Chip Unicorn 22:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Comments on a webcomic toplist of which every single webcomic in the world seems to be on? Blogs? .net (magazine) (which is probably a better source than anything above combined) has just done a feature on the top 50 british blogs, not all of them are notable. Crushyiffdestroy? A link to a source so POV and unreliable that the editors decided it shouldn't feature in the article? We'll be citing ALODs next. - Hahnchen 02:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, blogs and webcomic top lists are not reliabel sources on which t0 base encyclopedia articles. -- Dragonfiend 19:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I am unable to see that an encyclopedia article can be written on this subject. —Encephalon 08:40, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.