Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Business Bureau Video Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 04:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better Business Bureau Video Series[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article on this documentary series contains no references, and I can find none in a Google search. I found this journal which mentions the work, but which is not about the work so should not count.

Jefson, Cristy A. (2007). "Identity Theft and Consumer Health Education: A Case Study Teaching the Skill of Decision Making". Journal of School Health. 77 (7): 373–378. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00222.x. ISSN 0022-4391.

I expected that maybe there would be a review somewhere on this series but as it is privately distributed I can understand that perhaps this never happened. This product does not meet WP:GNG and I do not see information in the article which suggests it might be notable by any other criteria. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:16, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:22, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Advertisement with no independent sources.--Mr. Guye (talk) 01:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - might be G11-worthy, but indeed fails GNG. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 03:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Zero reliable sources, sounds like an Advertisement. --Seahorseruler ^{(Talk Page) (Contribs)} 03:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.