Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethany K. Scanlon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:24, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bethany K. Scanlon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC with no secondary sources, just links to her profile pages on Amazon and LibraryThing. No suggestion that Scanlon meets any criteria of WP:NAUTHOR. McGeddon (talk) 17:42, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as non-notable writer. Fails GNG. Quis separabit? 18:38, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:38, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I'm usually pretty good at sourcing minor writers to minor publications, but I'm coming up empty with this one. Seems to be another familiar type: a writer who somebody likes enough to promote on Wikipedia. But, no sources = no page. Feel free to flag me is anyone finds some reliable sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.