Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Could have been a WP:CSD candidate too--JForget 23:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Beth Williams[edit]

what a joke — Liverpool365 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 2009/06/26 16:15:12 (UTC).

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD is still set up wrong. The template above has no "View AfD" button.

Delete As factually innacurate. I found no evidence of this person being on J.O.N.A.S., as the article claims--CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 14:21, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Still delete, but now I believe that the info may be correct. The article was written by the subject, and there is zero coverage of this girl or her character that I can find. This may change, so no prejudice against recreation, but for now, delete as non-notable.--CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 14:58, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 15:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Found nothing at IMDB coverage of the show, and no entry at IMDB for the character or actress. Found nothing at Google News. The show's website might have some mention, but it does not make it easy to search. Fails verifiability and notability at this time. Lots of people are extras or have minor roles on tv. Lots of young people fantasize about being on tv. Edison (talk) 16:09, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete, Please As G3, a hoax. Along with all of the other evidence, I just powered through a few episodes on InDemand and there simply are no female characters not listed on the J.O.N.A.S. page. This is a fans fantasy, proven in that she wrote the page herself.--CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 17:11, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Almost-blatant hoax. Wikipedia is not an appropriate outlet for adolescent fantasies. Drawn Some (talk) 21:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as Hoax. It appears author has tried to write herself into the JONAS (TV series) [1][2]. Her very first edit on Wikipedia was to blank an article [3]. Not an auspicious beginning. Wow. SPA day ay Wikipedia. First the author and now the nominator. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete. I agree with Schmidt. Too funny. BioDetective2508 (talk) 14:03, 1 July 2009
Delete per nom. Schmidt, Drawn Some and I agreeing is more notable. Niteshift36 (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.