Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beth Hansen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beth Hansen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ANYBIO. This person is quoted a lot in the media, but there seem to be no secondary sources to support notability. Magnolia677 (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 01:35, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable local level realtor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:10, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not a realtor, by the way. Jacona (talk) 12:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Wikipedia is not an advertising site. WP:WWIN. SW3 5DL (talk) 20:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising? How is this article any sort of advertising? Sorry, I just don't see that at all. Could you elaborate on how you believe this to be advertising? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 10:24, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete somewhat reluctantly, as there is an argument that the regional coverage she has received may be adequate to meet notability as a state-level CEO of a major trade organization. However, in this case, the article is so clearly a promo piece for a person who is a lobbyist for the real estate industry that it really does require deletion per WP:NOADS. In fact, it smacks of being a paid piece, though the editor probably was more interested in her connection to Florida sports figures, but there, we have NOTINHERITED. Montanabw^(talk) 19:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The question is not whether the article is good, but whether the subject of the article is notable, isn't it? And are you really accusing me of paid editing? And if this is advertising, what am I selling for goodness sake? This person is not a realtor, but as stated, a state-level CEO of a major trade organization. Jacona (talk) 01:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.