Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bet Your Bottom Dollar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bet Your Bottom Dollar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Spam for non notable future film. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Refbombed with routine announcements, reproduced PR, a listing and local interest puff. Constructed by an SPA and a bunch of Guernsey IPs. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:TOOSOON to tell whether it's going to be notable. Currently over-referenced with regurgitated press-release PR material. Needs true independent write-ups to be notable in future. Elemimele (talk) 08:04, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United Kingdom. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:33, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

:* Keep the film is notable. It has been covered by the likes of Deadline Hollwood. Moreover, it has received wider interest than mere "routine announcements", with proof in articles in which it was name-dropped in independent, third-party reliable sources, such as Media Play News and frompage2screen. Further, all sources are international media / news outlets. I don't think any of the sources can be reasonably described as "local interest puff". I don't see any local news outlet reporting being cited. I do however agree that the references section could be cleaned - perhaps it is worth removing regurgitated news pieces that are spin-outs from the initial Deadline Hollywood article. One could argue that a film with the likes of Paterson Joseph and César Award-nominated Marc Duret is inherently notable. Thanks @Duffbeerforme for raising. Very best regards.

~~46.31.240.176 (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2023 (UTC)~~The user has been blocked per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dobhran6ruadh DonaldD23 talk to me 21:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.