Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bestune T55

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 14:51, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bestune T55[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This truck apparently exists but is otherwise unremarkable. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. This is one of a series of questionably sourced articles about Chinese automobiles created by the same editor. Mo Billings (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Mo Billings (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Mo Billings: How does it not meet notability? The truck does exist, and many sources say so. If you read all of the sources I have listed, you will find that they support eachother. DestinationFearFan (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.
1. 卢笙, ed. (2021-02-01). "一汽奔腾T55将3月初预售 3月底正式上市" (in Chinese). China Central Television. Archived from the original on 2021-02-27. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
2. 庞硕 (2021-02-25). "率先推1.5T车型奔腾T55将于3月底上市". Eastmoney.com (in Chinese). Archived from the original on 2021-02-27. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
3. 郑谊 (2021-02-02). "奔腾T55实车曝光，颜值挺高，奔腾找对方向了" (in Chinese). Phoenix Television. Archived from the original on 2021-02-27. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
4. "奔腾新SUV T55到店实拍 3月将上市预计8万元起售" (in Chinese). zh:青岛新闻. 2021-02-22. Archived from the original on 2021-02-27. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
5. "奔腾T55实车曝光，定位紧凑型SUV，今年一季度上市" (in Chinese). TOM Online. 2021-01-12. Archived from the original on 2021-02-27. Retrieved 2021-02-27.
There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Bestune T55 to pass Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".
Cunard (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2021-02 ✍️ create

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The best I can do (as someone who cannot read the language) to evaluate the sources provided above, on the page, and from searching the name of the vehicle is to machine translate them, skim them, and check that the source is a reliable enough source on this topic and that the article does not appear to be paid coverage of some form. To me it looks like there are multiple sources passing all those conditions, those sources just happen to not be in English. That constitutes a pass of WP:GNG. I would change my mind if someone with relevant language ability can explain that the coverage is somehow not independent, but on my own I can find no reason to think that. - Astrophobe (talk) 03:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.