Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Best Frenz Forever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 12:35, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Best Frenz Forever[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 06:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Sorry to say, Nepal is poor in mass media and digital field. I've added IMDb id and did minor changes too. References looks good to me. To me, It's notable enough to keep. Kind regards, — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 12:00, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Tulsi Bhagat, I am sorry but that's simply not good enough, not for a commercial product released in the last decade. Notable movies in the past few years do get at least one or two SIGCOV or few of routine and trivial coverage each, and quite a bit more in non-national/mainstream news sources which do have editorial boards if not a very big journalistic reputation or reach. It either needs to satisfy at least a very lenient interpretation of the GNG requirement (IAR because systemic bias) or it has to show it's significant in some other way (so we can divine that it either has coverage we haven't access to and/or will continue to have coverage/influence in the future). That's for maintaining a stub; to write an actual article, we need those RSes now. Regards! Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 19:27, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — When searching this film on Google;I could not find anything that would make it notable. CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 19:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.