Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Oliva
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 October 29. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 23:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Bert Oliva[edit]
- Bert Oliva (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article doesn't have reliable sources independent of the subject, and so does not meet the general notability guideline or the notability guideline for people. Extensive talk page discussions with Mr. Oliva's supporters on the article talk page have turned up many attempts at sourcing, but they are mostly trivial mentions or primary sources. The only exception is an article about Oliva's advertising agency in the Pinecrest Tribune, which is an alternative weekly / 'community news' publication. I do not believe the Tribune article rises to the level of a reliable biographical source. MrOllie (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:12, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:GNG. There may be a cache of non-English references on there on them, but if there is it's well hidden... Stuartyeates (talk) 23:10, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.