Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bert Hubert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bert Hubert[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:TOOSOON. Even if subject's PowerDNS software may be notable, it doesn't imply the author itself is notable enough for Wikipedia with very few if any third party reliable sources (WP:RS). The only reference being mentioned is an RFC where the article subject is an author, and that is not enough to establish facts per for biographies of living persons (WP:BLP). COI editor in PowerDNS article. WubTheCaptain (talk) 02:26, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable software developer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Could not find the needed coverage to establish notability. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG.--Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 18:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:40, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without much better sourcing for a BLP - David Gerard (talk) 08:17, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete concur with nom, no indication of notability. MB 18:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.