Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie, Mack, and Louie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernie, Mack, and Louie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability outside of the films they were in (MVP: Most Valuable Primate, MVP 2: Most Vertical Primate, and MXP: Most Xtreme Primate). Any information here could likely be merged into the relevant film articles. clpo13_(talk) 23:11, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 23:13, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

looking further:

alt:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete as the "characters" of Bernie, Mack, and Louie were performed by trained chimpanzee Jack (chimpanzee), so any list article of his projects (if there is one) should be about him. A mention within the respective film articles is just fine per Los Angeles Times. Entertanment Weekly, Variety, Chicago Sun-Times, Chicago Tribune. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 05:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and merge information into the relevant film. Very few human characters in films are worthy of their own article (most are just named in the filmography of the actor who played them); even less these chimpanzees. List also includes "Lucy" and "Baby Jack" so the article title isn't totally correct anyway. Richard3120 (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete solely as there's nothing to basically merge, nothing else convincing certainly for own article. SwisterTwister talk 00:47, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete there do not seem to be acceptable reliable sources available for this topic to merit inclusion on Wikipedia. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 02:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.