Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Sokpe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Bernard Sokpe

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Bernard Sokpe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Edwardx (talk) 12:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Edwardx, subject meets the minimum threshold for meeting notability by the English Wikipedia standards of three articles. Article has about 8 articles referenced to meet the notability and more over the article is a Stub which indicates the article meets the minimum threshold and is subject to improvement. I believe those should be measures that should be pointed at when issues of deletion comes up. Owula kpakpo (talk) 12:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

• • Hello, can you direct me to where the English Wikipedia minimum threshold is established at three? And the scope of GNG is more than number, are the 8 sources you mentioned independent and reliable? NiklausGerard (talk) 21:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Ghana. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 14:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:24, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

• Comment Can't comment on the reliability of the sources used, leaning delete. Oaktree b (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.