Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berlin International Church

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. TigerShark (talk) 00:14, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin International Church[edit]

PROD was contested with a comment as follows:

There is no proof that this church is "non-notable" and there is no parent organization page that this "church" or page would be redirected to.

A 200-hundred member church is probably not notable, and redirecting to the stated parent organization, the Evangelical Free Church, resulted in my edit being reverted by the creator. Delete.

Incidentally, I am a member of the Evangelical Free Church myself. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The organization that you speak of that was "stated" in the article is not even the same. I suggest you check the sources for further details before assuming that the GERMAN EVANGELISCHE FREIKIRCHLIGE ORGANISATION and the America Evangelical Freechurches are the same thing. This church is notable within the english speaking world in Germany and Europe and you have no proof that it is not other your own opinion, which in this case is false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JujuTea (talk • contribs) 22:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, we've had people come in from Germany who said it was indeed the same denomination. But as for the notability of this local church, the onus of proof is on you. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Pretty much a spam page. No real assertation of notability in any event. CitiCat^♫ 22:57, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliable sources are provided. Terraxos (talk) 04:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete 200 attendees at a church does not make it notable. No other assertion of notability. no third party sources. jonathon (talk) 23:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per jonathon. It is not the burden of the nominator (or anyone else) to demonstrate a lack of notability. The burden is on the author (or other person who wants the article to be kept) to demonstrate that the subject has notability. This has not been done. Gromlakh (talk) 03:47, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.