Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Berlin Feminist Film Week

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. Kurykh (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Berlin Feminist Film Week[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only found one reference on Google News, and that was just acknowledging its existence. Borders on a PROD due to lack of notability. It seems unlikely that more NPOV external sources can be found. South Nashua (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

... and the fact that there is no German Wikipedia article on the event doesn't give one confidence, either. 13:19, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Comment No German Wikipedia article is troublesome to me as well (however obviously not complete 'deal-breaker'). I did however find some entries in Google that are potentially notable for this? Berlin Film Journal Is that potentially notable (for an example) South Nashua? My Google Search--TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: I think we'd need a couple to pass GNG. Thank you for your efforts searching, though. South Nashua (talk) 23:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@South Nashua: I agree with that haha. Here are two more I was able to find - at that was going through 10 pages of that google search I linked. Amnesty.de and TheUpcoming.co.uk (not sure if this one is notable or not...) --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: I guess we could give it a go. I don't like proposing deletion just for deletion's sake, if something can be saved, I'm okay to roll with that. South Nashua (talk) 23:21, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@South Nashua: So what happens now? We work on the article or? (new to AfD) --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:55, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@TheSandDoctor: An admin will close this as the nomination is technically withdrawn now. (If I was an admin, I'd close it, but alas, I am not.) Happy to work on the article with you, but my expertise is a mile wide and an inch deep, not sure if I can add much. South Nashua (talk) 20:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@South Nashua: I am not sure where to start other than proving it potentially notable haha. And you can close them yourself - see User talk:Mz7#Question about MfD discussions. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 23:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.