Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benoit ramognino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Benoit ramognino[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparent autobiography, promotional and lacking outside references. Prod contested by article creator. --Finngall ^talk 17:26, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An uploaded autobiographical CV which the subject didn't even bother to render into English. Nothing found on Highbeam or Questia about the subject; the best I can find is probably this short piece about him dealing in furniture. Not enough for encyclopaedic biographical notability. AllyD (talk) 20:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not the place for his CV. PaintedCarpet (talk) 21:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as cv crap. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 22:10, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non notable, unsourced, CV.--Theredproject (talk) 18:49, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Borderline G11, fails WP:GNG/WP:PROMO. ~ | twsx | ^talk_cont | ~ 08:40, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Wikipedia is not a free place to host one's spam - "Benoit Ramognino promotes ..." says it all. Bearian (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.