Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benji Travis

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 07:39, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Benji Travis[edit]

Benji Travis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Much like his wife Judy, I do not believe Benji Travis is notable enough for Wikipedia. A majority of the sources are not about Benji himself, but his children or the YouTube channel his wife runs. Furthermore, some sources that are also in the article on Judy are not reliable, such as #3, #5 (it appears that employees of the company uFluencer are the ones creating articles on these individuals), #6 (the article is mainly about a specific video), #8 (mainly about his wife), #9 (again, the article is mainly about a specific video), #10 (mainly about his daughter), #12, #14, and #16. I think aside from being deleted, this article should be locked so only administrators can edit it. The image in the article appears to have been uploaded by the subject himself (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Benji_travis_video_influencer_brand.jpg) which (as far as I know) is allowed, but it makes the case that the article is not NPOV stronger because it shows he knows the article exists (but has not made that clear to everyone else like one is supposed to). Andise1 (talk) 00:20, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Just looked at the article again, and the section titled "ItsJudytime, ItsJudysLife, & ItsMommysLife" is clearly NPOV/promotional (i.e. "With over 1 billion videos views to date Benji Travis has helped his now wife to work with some of the biggest fortune 500 brands and become one of the most respected Mom Influencers online. The Two Channels are part of Youtubes top 1% of an exclusive group called the Youtube Preferred list"). Andise1 (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as spam on an otherwise unremarkable subject. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:01, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.