Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Parzybok

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Stifle (talk) 15:41, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Parzybok[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 12:04, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 12:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets NAUTHOR per the reviews for Couch in the LAtimes, Publishers Weekly, the L Magazine, the profile in the Oregonian, and for Sherwood nation in electric literature, Locus magazine and Kirkus, and publishers weekly. PainProf (talk) 23:13, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:23, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,

Salvio

16:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is a close call. Seems to be ordinary set of non-substantial mentions related to the debut novel. Carrite (talk) 00:17, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: In fact, the subject does not meet WP:AUTHOR. It is a complete misnomer that one's work/s being reviewed meets AUTHORC#3. It is that one's works receiving multiple reviews in reliable sources is a prerequisite to meeting C#3. Ravenswing 16:41, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NAUTHOR#3 The LA Times, the Oregonian. The subject passed our notability guidelines. Wm335td (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.