Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Franklin, Self-Revealed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. The article can definitely stand to be expanded, but the one source added, although small, proves notability. Non-admin closure. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:45, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Franklin, Self-Revealed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has only a few bits of info and hasn't been edited for over a year Mysteryman19 (talk) 01:07, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable, won a Pulitzer Prize. Not being edited in over a year isn't grounds for deletion. Dayewalker (talk) 01:46, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It has won a major literary award, satisfying WP:Notability (books). Clarityfiend (talk) 03:24, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I don't see a reference to a Pullitzer Prize, which seems interesting since the first year it was awarded was apparently 1917, same year the book was published... but even with that discrepancy, looks like a lot of books published by this guy that got indexed. It's definitely a stub, and should be expanded, but I don't see any issue with a book of a U.S. Senator (William Cabell Bruce) having a stub article. Shadowjams (talk) 05:56, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: the award is listed here. Dewritech (talk) 10:34, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep now that the Pulitzer Prize (already mentioned in the text) has been sourced. WP:BEFORE would have been the way to go here.--Arxiloxos (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, Pulitzer Prize winner. Nsk92 (talk) 17:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.