Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bengt Oelmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:34, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bengt Oelmann[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 05:23, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google scholar provides no evidence (such as highly cited publications) that would lead to a pass of WP:PROF #1, nor do I see any other reason for keeping. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WoS also lends no evidence – shows an h-index of only 2 ("Author=(Oelmann B*)"). Uncontroversial delete. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 15:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.