Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bench trending

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bench trending[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neologism. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 05:39, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 05:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Phrase gets all of 396 Google hits, none of which explain what this allegedly is. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 05:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Neologism As per nom, very little reliable sourcing. Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEO and WP:GNG; I can not find significant coverage for this term. Gong show 20:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.