Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Roth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 01:08, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Roth[edit]

Ben Roth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability WP:GNG - hako9 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. - hako9 (talk) 15:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete non notable --Devokewater@ 16:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete current source, an interview, contributes little to notability and searching found nothing helpful. Happy to reconsider if better sources are found. Gab4gab (talk) 18:55, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete a non-notable businessman.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete only source is an interview in the local newspaper. Best, GPL93 (talk) 03:43, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:BIO and the GNG. JavaHurricane 04:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, WP:MILL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT. There's nothing in the article, beyond a bare claim that he's done anything notable. A search online revealed lots of similarly-named individuals, but not him. The only source is a local newspaper Q + A. The creator is an SPA who's only created this and edited a local HS (his alma mater), leading me to think she's a friend, relative, partner, or employee of the subject. This is fairly clearly spam for his business. In 2008, we could have excused it, but in 2020, everybody know that we are not a web host or social media spot. Bearian (talk) 23:35, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:BIO, really hard to find any sources on this subject. EverybodyEdits (talk) 05:34, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.