Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Jordan: Paranormal Investigator
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:49, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ben Jordan: Paranormal Investigator[edit]
Non-notable. Original research. No reliable sources to support importance. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- This game won the American Girlscouts "Best Story in an AGS Game" "Best Player Character in an AGS Game" and "Best AGS Documentation" [1]. Game also gets about 700 hits on a google exact-name search.[2].
I weakly favor keeping this article.---J.S (T/C) 00:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- According to the americangirlscouts.org main page, "Who are we? We are a collection of geeks, most of whom have a long-time association with AGS. This site exists because we like to tell stupid people that AGS stands for 'American Girl Scouts'. It also serves as a communal site for the owners of the server on which it is situated." Seems like not a very notable page. Also, 700 hits is really very few. Andre (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The American Girl Scouts awards page is just a summary of the more professional pages on the AGS site. The awards are given by the AGS community, of which the "girl scouts" are only a few. I ahve also added 9 references for notability to the page, so it now meets WP:SOFTWARE --Amaccormack 09:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It is one of the extremely notable Adventure Game Studio games. Strong Keep 69.112.43.41 14:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Due to new sources provided by Amaccormack. Now they're in the article itself they'll hopefully be integrated in time as references. The article's well-presented and I'm pleased that the creator saw fit to include all episodes on the one article rather than going silly and spraying them around like confetti. :D QuagmireDog 23:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - the third and fourth entries in the series won multiple AGS awards, [3] so the series as a whole is notable enough. 195.114.94.194 23:36, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- HEY HO! LETS GO! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.2.53.30 (talk)
- Keep, one of the lengthier series in its genre, and one that has won multiple awards. (Radiant) 13:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.