Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Barker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 00:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Barker[edit]

Non-notable bio about a student with extremely marginal political influence. Autobiographical. —Cuivi é nen, 01:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Support nn - Draeco 02:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain whatever, its not hurting anything Perle 02:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note:User's 6th edit to Wikipedia, has 0 edits to mainspace. --kingboyk 02:45, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete per nom Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 02:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. This student is non-notable. I did find an article in which he was mentioned, but it could apply to nearly any typical high school student in the U.S. ~MDD 46 96 02:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Completely useless. Chairman S. ^Talk 02:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, nn. --kingboyk 02:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - nn vanity. dbtfz ^talk 03:02, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. -- Oarias 03:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, non-notable per WP:BIO. --Kinu ^t/_c 03:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn Bucketsofg 04:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "extremely marginal" is an exaggeration. vanity. Moe Aboulkheir 04:36, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nicely formatted, seemingly well written and sourced (except for a decided POV and some basic punctuation problems). What a shame this editor chose to write about himself instead of devoting his talent to an article on which he might be more objective. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 04:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, your typical vanity page. Royboy crashfan 04:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, vanity per above nom. Kuru ^talk 05:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete', vanispamcruftisement. Daniel Case 05:40, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as vanity, nn-bio. --Ter e nc e Ong 06:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 13:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 17:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn auto-bio. Vanispamcruftisement seems about right. --Deville (Talk) 17:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I could say slightly borderline Compu terjoe 19:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy & delete (to User:Bjbarker1988). --Karnesky 22:33, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Khoikhoi 01:57, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable yet -- Samir (the scope) 02:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. ProhibitOnions 21:54, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.