Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belt buckle hole

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:36, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Belt buckle hole[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, non-encyclopedic entry without information worthy of being added to Belt; an unlikely search term not worth redirecting. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:01, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This material could easily be covered in belt. Illinois2011 (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Borderline WP:NONSENSE. Pburka (talk) 21:26, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unsourced, original research and advocates a point of view, implies falsely that the belt buckle hole, by itself, keeps up the trousers when, in fact, it is the mobile spike on the belt that is placed into the hole! Even if it were correct, it would be impermissible under WP:NOTHOWTO. This is unsalvageable, irredeemable, possibly violates WP:BLP1E, WP:MEMORIAL, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:CRYSTAL, though I'm not certain how. Author has also written some equally controversial articles about the curtain ring and the pen lid. These would be useful for people who have seen these items and have no idea how they work. Mandsford 22:19, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You're overlooking WP:HOAX, as it is not the buckle which has the hole, but the belt itself. ---Nat Gertler (talk) 22:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think the term means hole for a belt buckle, not hole in a belt buckle, so it is not entirely inaccurate. Anyway, I say Delete, for those who want a bolded statement. Perhaps the page creator, too, could be temporarily blocked for repeated hoaxing/trolling. LordVetinari (talk) 22:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gertler was joking about the hole in the belt buckle thing, of course. His or her comments in the nomination, of course, are right on point. Mandsford 14:33, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: look at creators' creations, he's yanking our chains.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 02:52, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note I've added pen lid to afd as well. You can find its entry here. Illinois2011 (talk) 08:33, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:BREAKSEVERYRULE, which doesn't exist but should do. I give it 3 days before somebody suggests snowball deletion, which is an incorrect prediction because I just suggested it. Anyway, yeah, delete it. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.