Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellshill Celebration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bellshill Celebration[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed. New article for a non-notable feast/celebration. Drmies (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it should be notable if it has been held across the United Kingdom for thirty years!Britishman9999 (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- If it has, it should be, yes. Drmies (talk) 20:41, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Hoax. Held across the UK? Yeah, right! -- Necrothesp (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have never heard of it and I can see no evidence on Google that others have either. I too conclude that it is made up. --AJHingston (talk) 20:02, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a lack of coverage by reliable secondary sources. A search for news articles doesn't bring up anything, which is suspicious for a celebration that is allegedly widespread. The subject does not meet the general notability criteria.--xanchester (t) 03:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.