The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:09, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Corporate spamicruft MNewnham 21:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete as per nominator. Thryduulf 13:27, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CORP, advert, the only surprising thing is the lack of a weblink. Stifle 15:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
