Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belal taheri

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. v/r - T P 03:06, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Belal taheri[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BIO or WP:ACADEMIC. Randykitty (talk) 12:40, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing notable. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 17:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A person from Iran will be notable in Iran. Sources are not required to be in English, nor expected to be. A Google search of the Farsi name found some sources. However they are marginal and I am unable to find enough to build a case. Perhaps others will have better luck searching Iranian sources. Google Translate makes it accessible for anyone, Google results say "Translate this page". -- Green Cardamom (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As mentioned above, subject appears to be non-notable. The author of the article has not bothered to write correctly in English, and even the article's title is not properly capitalized. Since notice of possible deletion, neither have the original author or the subject himself made any attempts to improve the content.--Akhooha (talk) 05:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Thanks for your attention, i redirected the article and capitalized article's title. Now you can see database references in article too.Faribaghoroghi (talk) 09:44, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:01, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.