Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bejan Almazov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bejan Almazov[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable sport fighter. Purpose seems to be to advertise his school (COI). No support for any of the titles and doubtful they would meet notablility requirements if there were. Does not meet WP:KICK, WP:NBOX or WP:GNG. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 12:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. The only reference is to a website that anyone can post records on and the external link is to a site that is not yet active. My search found no significant coverage. Neither sherdog nor boxrec list him at all, despite the article's claim he has 23 professional MMA fights just in the U.S. and is undefeated in 25 pro boxing fights.Jakejr (talk) 00:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I declined the BLP-prod for this, since there did seem to be references, but now that I look at it I'm convinced that the article is WP:BOLLOCKS, a fighter with this sort of record would have at least some reliable coverage to corroborate the story but there's nothing there. Delete. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 02:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.