Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behind the Sun (Chicane album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Behind the Sun (Chicane album)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails notability, little context, nothing but a tracklisting and tiny paragraph. Alan - talk 04:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 04:11, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I'm not sure what version the nom read, but there's more than a paragraph there. It also passes Wp:NALBUMS, which states that "if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia". It's also helped by making the Albums Top 10 chart overe here, plus going gold as well. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:48, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable. See also [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] for more coverage than you could shake a big stick at.--Michig (talk) 20:28, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. I agree with the notability arguments above and find the PROD nomination to be curious. Look at the history of the article and it was in its current state of detail long before it was nominated for deletion. Perhaps the nom is in error - in any case this article should not suffer for it. Doomsdayer520 (talk) 09:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep. Easily meets WP:NALBUMS. Coverage from multiple WP:RS exists, and it's an officially released album from a notable artist. Merging into Chicane's main article or discography article is not a reasonable option, so an independent article is warranted. Gongshow ^Talk 08:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another strong keep. The only question I ask here: who on Earth decided it was right to delete an album page that easily has more information - and sources - than a stub article that isn't considered to be deletable? This article helped me identify where "Don't Give Up" came from to appear on a Bryan Adams compilation - without this article, I had no information. Alan, I think you're mistaken on this one. CycloneGU (talk) 04:33, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.