Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beetroot Design Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio$ ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:42, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Beetroot Design Group[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG - references are either from company itself or have trivial mentions of company. mikeman67 (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With 9 references from various sources, including greek and international ones, including digital and print sources, I fail to see how this is even CONSIDERED to have "trivial mentions" of the studio. Could you please be more specific?

Danielpogur (talk) 06:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Danielpogur[reply]

Comment. Hi there. Wikipedia policy, per WP:CORP, requires that a company to have "been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." The number of sources alone do not establish significant coverage. Take a look at WP:CORPDEPTH for more examples. The only source that could in any way be considered significant is from red-dot.org. Generally industry award sites aren't considered significant or independent. If you have sources that indicate substantial coverage, such as a company profile in a national newspaper, please share them here or add them to the article. mikeman67 (talk) 15:46, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reply. Thank you for taking the time to provide me with an answer, I do disagree though with several points. The European Design Awards is as significant as the Red Dot (if not even more). The Novum (german magazine) is being published since 1924, one of the oldest communication design magazines in the world. If this is not a "respectful" and significant source, then I don't know what is. Further more, we're having a discussion on whether a studio is significant or not, when Beetroot have won two of the most important accolades any communication design studio would kill for: European Design Agency of the year 2008 and Red Dot Agency of the year 2011... (!) With all due respect, I really don't see the point in this discussion. Danielpogur (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:08, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:45, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:CORP. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:37, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notabity proved, sufficient and reliable sources provided. Demetriosakadimman 16:38, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:CORP. the majority of sources are primary or tiny mentions. LibStar (talk) 14:57, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:CORP due to lack of sources beyond industry publications. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:08, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.