Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beer Chips (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 14:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Beer Chips[edit]

Beer Chips (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable Amisom (talk) 14:51, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep article includes links to eight sources, including multiple dedicated articles from independent sources. --Danski454 (talk) 20:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep – Meets GNG. See the sources I presented in the last AfD discussion for examples (some are 404 now). More sources exist in addition to these as well. North America1000 08:53, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. References in article meet WP:GNG (the Washingtom Post is a quality WP:SIGCOV). Tricky product to search for given "generic name", but when combined with the founders name, even more decent references turn up (e.g. here from Cigar Aficionado). I don't see how its notability has decreased from the 2014 AfD? Britishfinance (talk) 00:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.