Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beelzebubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.--Hús ö nd 01:53, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beelzebubs[edit]

College a cappella article which does not meet the notability requirements of WP:MUSIC or the verifiability requirements of WP:RS/WP:NOR. Claims to notability include “pioneering the contemporary a cappella sound” (cited to a blurb on a site where they sell their albums, not an independent review) and having “permanently affected the characteristics of collegiate and contemporary a cappella” (without a source). Multiple, non-trivial secondary-sources are required to establish the notability of a group. Claims from their own website are insufficient. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 00:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No evidence of notability. Stebbins 02:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom - and prior arguments. SkierRMH,05:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Josh Parris#: 06:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:MUSIC. MER-C 06:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:MUSIC, WP:V. Ter e nc e Ong 07:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:MUSIC --Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 13:11, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for all the above reasons, and because it is all too easy for college students and alums to make wikipedia a venue for pushing the supposed "fame" of their pet organizations and causes. This is the case at many, many articles on college orgs, from a cappella groups to orchestras to newspapers to tennis teams.--Dmz5 20:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete - fails WP:RS -- Whpq 17:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was gonna write a big full-blown case for deletion, but realized while writing it that it sounded redundant, so I'll just agree with everyone else here on the article failing WP:MUSIC and WP:V. --Machchunk | make some noise at me 18:38, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.