Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedtime Rhymes

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ladybird Books. MBisanz talk 02:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bedtime Rhymes[edit]

Bedtime Rhymes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. My original rationale was that (allowing for the relatively common words in the title) extant sources available online weren't confirming much beyond the book's existence, which doesn't meet GNG as a result. The article was de-PROD'ed with the contention that a book published in 1977 wouldn't necessarily have much available through a web search, which is fair enough, but the issue of the book's notability still remains. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 22:55, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:38, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:39, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, book's author, audrey daly quite a prolific ladybird book writer with 40+ books to her credit, this one doesn't appear to be anymore notable than the others, btw, don't get me wrong about ladybird books, i have some wonderful childhood memories about them (who could forget Tootles the taxi, or The Five little kittens or the Hannibal hamster series:)), i'd love to have wikiarticles on all of them but without the sources this isn't going to happen, sad to say but this one looks like a delete. ps. the article says 149 pages for book length, it is not, it is 51pages like other ladybird books from the 1970s. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Ladybird Books until notability can be established. ~Kvng (talk) 18:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Ladybird Books. This way if someone searches this plausible search term, they will at least find the source. Dennis Brown - 19:58, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.