Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedbug (comics)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bedbug (comics)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was PRODed by User:Argento Surfer but had previous contested PRODs. I didn't notice this and deleted the page (*trouts self*). PROD concern was "Non-notable minor fictional character. Very little real-world information on subject." Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 05:40, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Many of the article's content fails neutral point of view TheChampionMan1234 05:43, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per rationale by nom. A search didn't bring up anything that would show that this character is notable in the slightest. Even if the comic it appeared in was notable, notability isn't inherited by being part of a notable comic. Although since the article for the comic series doesn't exist and also doesn't appear to be notable, this is a moot point.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:49, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 17:36, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Unfortunately, comic book characters will rarely receive outside world references, and if any, they are insignificant. Google News found one link here but this appears to be the only evidence of significant third-party sources. As mentioned by Tokyogirl79, considering that there isn't an article for the series, redirecting wouldn't be an option. SwisterTwister talk 01:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. Reyk _YO! 02:06, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks sources to establish notability as per the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 02:14, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the comic this character is from doesn't have an article, what more the character? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 22:16, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.