Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Becoming leb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:11, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Becoming leb[edit]

nn film, but can't find anything that qualifies for speedy Will (^E_@) T 06:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not everything that should be deleted is speediable. Delete. --W(t) 06:10, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not listed on IMDB. NurMisur 07:12, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are many films not listed on IMDB (especially foreign films). That does not make them non-notable as these films cater to a niche audience. I feel that we should keep this as it provides the reader useful information on films that are not well known to the general public. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:03, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even ten relevant google hits. David Sneek 17:45, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This is apparently a short film made by high school students and distributed only online. As such it would not qualify for IMDb unless it was extensively discussed in major media. As a general rule, qualifying for IMDb should be a minimum requirement for a film to have a Wikipedia entry (not all IMDb-listed films are notable enough for Wikipedia). --Metropolitan90 22:32, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Ardenn 04:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn, advertising. Bearcat 00:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.