Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beautiful music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: nom withdrawn, and no other deletion arguments (oldid) czar 19:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beautiful music[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dubious music genre article. Coin945 (talk) 11:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC) "Withdrawn by nominator" per Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion#The recent music genre AFDs--Coin945 (talk) 14:38, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources.--SabreBD (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 12:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Sabrebd, I can't speedy close this discussion unless you retract your delete !vote. Do you still have a case for deletion considering the below and nom withdrawal? czar 16:35, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn--SabreBD (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep The nominator and !voter above clearly have no clue about the topic and haven't made the slightest effort to find out. Please see The Concise Encyclopedia of American Radio which explains this was a well-recognised category in the 1950s and 1960s. All the nominations in this deletion spree that I've checked seem like this. Andrew D. (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.