Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaufort railway station, New Jersey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-admin closure)--Antigng (talk) 10:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beaufort railway station, New Jersey[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A possible hoax, this article has been tagged for notability since 2008. I was unable to find any evidence of this railway station's existence even after extensive searches in both google books and newspapers.com. The closest I could find was a mention on the Whippany Railway Museum website that a station may have existed on Beaufort Avenue Winner 42 Talk to me! 14:47, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - as no notability whatsoever. It's not a hoax (reference here), but unless Jimmy Hoffa is buried there, will never meet GNG. —Мандичка^YO 😜 16:50, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Not a hoax.[1] Was a real station and even though the station closed in the early 20th Century, there still is easily-found coverage online.[2] Given it hasn't existed in over 75 years, there is probably more not published online.--Oakshade (talk) 15:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Does appear to have existed and all railway stations are kept. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:14, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - Like any pre 1960s related articles leniency is usually given as sources are next to none impossible to find on them and this is no different - I'd imagine there were newspaper stories on it so will have to go with Keep. –Davey2010^Talk 18:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.