Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beau Mirchoff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 08:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beau Mirchoff[edit]

subject does not seem to meet wikipedia's notability criteria (see Wikipedia:Notability (people). Article makes no appearant claim of notabilty and cites no secondary sources. Stevecudmore 19:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through the history, it appears that a previous version that did have sources and some assertion of notability - his acting career - was in place until someone came in and edited the heck out of it, losing the mention of his acting. I reverted to that version, and it appears there's a little to work with there - but not a lot. Very weak keep on the basis of his acting credit, the Times-Colonist feature and claims of future work. Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:20, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. As his IMDb listing and his TV.com credits show, this actor has had only two roles, neither of which is very impressive. --Evb-wiki 20:22, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Under WP:BIO, a high school football star and a bully in Scary Movie 4 doesn't qualify as being notable. *Cremepuff 222* 00:44, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I agree with the above. I would take this opportunity to say that there are many show business articles of the same level of importance that are alive and well on these pages. We should strive to be even-handed in our approach. --Stormbay 14:52, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.