Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BeauSandVer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BeauSandVer[edit]

BeauSandVer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't see how this can meet WP:NOTABILITY Boleyn (talk) 08:38, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:52, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Griffiths, Sian (2 August 2009). "A disastrous gamble - Some bright pupils who took the international baccalaureate are deeply regretting it, says Sian Griffiths". The Sunday Times.(subscription may be required or content may be available in libraries)
  • Delete. A non article. Szzuk (talk) 16:02, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge a brief summary to the artile on each of the three participating schools. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:54, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to St Albans#Education, or just delete. We don't usually deal with non-notable programmes at this level. --Bejnar (talk) 17:03, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete- This seems awfully trivial to dignify with an encyclopedia article. Are we going to document every instance of universities agreeing on things amongst themselves. Naturally the only sources in the article or which I can find anywhere are not independent of the institutions; thus, the article fails WP:N. Reyk YO! 05:54, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just delete it. Contrary to Reyk these aren't universities, they're ordinary secondary schools. BeauSandVer amounts to a timetabling agreement between three local schools with pupil-sharing, a minibus service, and some guest speakers. We shouldn't have an article and there's nothing encyclopaedic to merge. It's not a plausible search term for uninvolved people and there are no encyclopaedic grounds for a redirect.—S Marshall T/C 18:41, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.