Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beatty Buck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 11:07, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Beatty Buck[edit]

A big deer that got shot, extreme trivia Delete -Doc ^ask? 22:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn. Monkeyman^(talk) 23:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 00:20, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I'm the one who deprodded this. I think it's pretty cool, and it's the second biggest ever, according to the article. That's notable within the context of hunting. It's not like we're overwhelmed with hunting trivia. Let's not delete this just because some people don't care about hunting. If it was second biggest in something nerdier, we'd consider that notable. NickelShoe 00:29, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Did you notice it was 39 point? 12 point is huge! It was a world record at the time, people. NickelShoe 00:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Doc, Monkeyman, and Blinguyen. And for the record I'm the one that originally prodded this article. James084 00:36, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NickleShoe. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 10:48, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep — Hunting records seem encyclopedic to me, just as we keep lists of the oldest humans, &c. But perhaps such information should be merged on to the Trophy hunting page? — RJH 16:34, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.