Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat the Chef UK

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Missvain (talk) 00:35, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beat the Chef UK[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The evidence here does not show notability . I do not know why this was moved from draft space DGG ( talk ) 03:52, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:59, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The move from draft to mainspace was an AfC outcome. While it is difficult to get excited about an article on a daytime cookery show, a multi-series series commissioned on national TV should meet WP:TVSERIES. However, in this case, there is a surprising lack of coverage, beyond routine industry announcements and schedule listings, and passing mentions relative to presenter Andi Oliver - more needed to demonstrate notability? AllyD (talk) 19:07, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[[user[reply]
Comment agree with AllyD on all points.Star7924 (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 00:58, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - albeit with no great enthusiasm. A gNews search for "Beat the Chef" seems to find a plurality of articles. --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

all trivial. We need substantial coverage. Articles like this are one of the key reasons this word is in the GNG. DGG ( talk ) 06:19, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All trivial, WP:MILL coverage that no way merits this an article. Java Hurricane 13:19, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.