Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beat Shuffle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 11:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beat Shuffle[edit]

Beat Shuffle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web content, lacks any reliable independent sources to establish notability, fails WP:NWEB WWGB (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Not a single source till now --C E (talk) 14:47, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:24, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:25, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - unreferenced software article of unclear notability, created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Redirect to Beat Communication,Inc.Ltd., the parent company is also possible, but that article has notability issues as well. A search turned up 1 piece of English-language PR from 2013, and some unrelated pages for a 'Beat Shuffle' Japanese FM radio program, but no further singnificant RS coverage. It is possible sourcing exists in Japanese.Dialectric (talk) 02:48, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment- One source, in Japanese, was posted on the article talk page. That source is Enterprizine: http://enterprisezine.jp/article/detail/6202. This appears to be a fairly brief article and on its own not sufficient to establish notability. I can't read it, so not sure what it actually says.Dialectric (talk) 03:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.