Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beast filmography

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Monty845 01:20, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Beast filmography[edit]

Beast filmography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This purports to be the filmography of the music group Beast, but is actually a set of filmographies of the group's members, all of whom have their own page and whose information belongs there. Additionally, the one-off reality show appearances have no place on Wikipedia, as per previous consensus. Also, all the references on this page come from unreliable sources and many are copyright violations. A music group really doesn't need a standalone filmography. Shinyang-i (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've removed all content that doesn't belong in a group filmography, and you can see how much now remains. Shinyang-i (talk) 20:02, 13 April 2015‎(UTC)
  • Merge with Beast (South Korean band) 5 credits is hardly a reason to give a filmography it's own page. Lady Lotus (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 20:24, 13 April 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 20:57, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. A list of the group's shows is short and will fit on the band article. Random86 (talk) 21:00, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @ Lady Lotus & Random86: To be fair, there WAS more content at the time of nomination. Others may click the link to determine if any belong elsewhere, or nowhere at all. Schmidt, Michael Q. 23:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I was aware of that, but I agree with the removal. It was mostly non-group credits and reality/variety show guest appearances. Random86 (talk) 23:48, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • Agree or no, it is unfair to a reasonable discussion to declare content non-notable and then preemptively remove it BEFORE THE DISCUSSION CLOSES without allowing others to judge for themselves. Schmidt, Michael Q. 12:14, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • You know what? I've already been reamed for it, even though the instructions are unclear so you can just freaking drop it now. I did it in good faith because I thought it was right, and you wanna keep harping on it? That shit just runs people off. Change the freaking wording of the AFD instructions to say "don't change a damn thing" if you don't want this to happen again because right now it says to improve pages after they're AFD'd. I will quit this place if I have to listen to one more asshat talk about what a piece of shit I am for doing what needed to be done. If I hadn't AFD'd the hideous mess, I would have removed the info anyway. What's the difference when it happens? You know what, forget this. I'm out. I'm sick of every single tiny thing being a huge battle, I'm sick of working tirelessly on articles I actually don't care about, I'm tired of spinning my wheels trying to fix what's broke just to have someone else create 20 new crap promo articles in the time it takes me to merge, fix, or AFD one. And I do it just to try to clean up the promotional monstrosity that is "kpop on Wikipedia". I've had hate pages made about me, I've been stalked on and off this site, I've been called a racist, I've been threatened, I've had to continually stick my neck out and take the hate because there aren't enough others willing to do it. So you can take your technicalities and your high-horse attitude and run them all over this place because I ain't gonna be around to see it. Have fun. Shinyang-i (talk) 04:50, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • MichaelQSchmidt, Shinyang-i's edits were made in good faith, and I hope you understand that. Shinyang-i, I hope you come back soon because you are needed here. Random86 (talk) 08:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
          • Shinyang-i - Sorry to be somewhat unhelpful here but being a WP:DIVA really doesn't help your case here, MQS was simply stating his opinion - You screwed up and you've admitted that so stop being a WP:DIVA and move on. –Davey2010Talk 08:20, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I've restored the content as I find it utterly moronic to simply AFD something and then wipe it all after ..... Why bother wiping it ?, Anyway I can't find any evidence of notability so will have to say Delete. –Davey2010Talk 00:16, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Davey2010, probably violates WP:IINFO as well. - Mailer Diablo 17:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - for this to be a filmography for Beast, I'd expect to see items which had a majority of the members of Beast in them (i.e. 4+ members); the most members in any of these films is 2, which is pushing it to be described as a 'Beast' film. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 15:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.