Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beaker (drinkware)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Cup. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beaker (drinkware)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. No refs on the page for many years and appears to be a WP:DICDEF with little way to expand or cite properly. There are related ideas such as Beaker (laboratory equipment) and Bell Beaker culture but I'm not seeing the RS for this term. JMWt (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. JMWt (talk) 18:05, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Technology. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge ~~to Beaker (archaeology)~~ which is also about drinkware except that it was dug up from the ground. Could use a line that the term has been used in modern contexts? Reywas92^Talk 19:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Cup. Beaker (archaeology) is not a good enough fit. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Agreed that's better. Reywas92^Talk 19:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Cup no point of the article with no sources. Merge per above. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 18:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.