Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beach bunny (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was AFD Withdrawn by nominator. --evrik ^(talk) 16:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beach bunny[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This disambiguation page has no content to disambiguate. The list entries are either not named "beach bunny", or do not exist. Some appear far-fetched, such as Gidget, where the assertion that she is the "prototypical beach bunny" looks like original research. See generally WP:DAB for what disambiguation pages are for. Sandstein 18:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Withdrawn following cleanup. Thanks! Sandstein 18:09, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, First, during the original AfD, the comments were evenly split, between deletion AND keeping or moving the information to another page. When the discussion was closed, it was simply deleted. The other day, I was going to create a disambig page, and get the original information restored to an article. Yes, there are a couple of redlinks, but there are also links to:

Media related to Beach bunny at Wikimedia Commons and
The dictionary definition of Beach bunny at Wiktionary

The Gidget reference comes from the Gidget article itself, and is not OR, but simply a description of the character. I think this page should be kept and it does serve a purpose. --evrik ^(talk) 22:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't address that all the stuff you put in this page is what a dab page is explicitly not for, see WP:DABNOT. Dab pages are only for listing articles that share the same name. There are none such here. Sandstein 23:25, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The editing guideline you cited does also mention Combining terms on disambiguation pages which is considered okay. --evrik ^(talk) 17:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - While not every item on this disambiguation page belongs there, this is an editing matter. Valid DAB page, useful navigational function. Carrite (talk) 01:37, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, particularly now that that a couple of the redlinks have become bluelinks. Could use a spot of editing. Herostratus (talk) 04:54, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 00:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There are at least ~~half a dozen~~ four legitimate (i.e. articles on topics called "beach bunny") things to disambiguate. Cnilep (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- NB: I have cleaned up the page to accord with MOS:DAB. There are now five blue links, plus one red link and one link to a list of short films that includes Beach Bunny. Cnilep (talk) 00:42, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, but move to Beach bunny (disambiguation) and redirect this title to Surf culture#Beach bunny, the clear primary topic of the term. bd2412 T 16:26, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Keep per WP:SNOW. We can still redirect or move it later. Bearian (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment when I first posed to Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Beach_bunny it was to get the history restored so I could see what the article used to look like. Since it looks like the page will remain for now, would someone please restore the old history? Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 15:44, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.