Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bea Fiedler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 22:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bea Fiedler[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page denotes the subject of a 2005 paternity lawsuit against Prince Albert of Monaco that was rejected, and the subject in question is a non-notable model with little to no independent reporting. Bettydaisies (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 22:20, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a clear one event failure. We have also stopped allowing promotional pushing titles by one magazine to matter at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
comment per Johnpacklambert Rajuiu (talk) 12:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.