Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batutut

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 08:23, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Batutut[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG; has not received significant coverage outside of fringe sources. –dlthewave ☎ 20:51, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:49, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Source is some crypto mirror in Archive. Zero usable content. Three alternate names are unrelated. Origin is barely a page from de:John MacKinnon, no secondary sources i can find.—eric 21:50, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unnacceptable sourcing. -Roxy, the PROD. . wooF 10:56, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - there's a lot of crap out there. I found two sources. Bearian (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 01:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Fails GNG. The two sources above -- Daily Mail and The Star -- are tabloids and not suitable. --K.e.coffman (talk) 02:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.